Which of the following is true about moving a victim with a spinal injury?

Moving a victim with a spinal injury requires careful consideration to prevent further harm. The correct assertion is that they should be moved only if absolutely necessary. This principle is crucial because any movement of a person with a suspected spinal injury can potentially exacerbate their condition and lead to increased injury or paralysis.

In emergency situations, if the environment poses an immediate threat (such as drowning or fire), and there's no way to stabilize the person safely, moving them might become essential. However, if the situation allows, it’s best to keep the victim still and wait for emergency personnel trained in spinal injuries to take appropriate action. This approach protects the spinal cord and reduces the risk of additional damage.

The other choices suggest actions that could impose a high risk of further injury, such as moving the victim quickly or positioning them upright in the water, which can induce a dangerous situation. Carrying a victim out on a raft can also be risky if proper stabilization is not provided. In summary, the priority with a suspected spinal injury is to minimize movement, emphasizing safety and stability over urgency unless absolutely necessary.